Trillian: General Transparency
- Working with the Code
- Use Cases
Trillian is an implementation of the concepts described in the Verifiable Data Structures white paper, which in turn is an extension and generalisation of the ideas which underpin Certificate Transparency.
Trillian implements a Merkle tree whose contents are served from a data storage layer, to allow scalability to extremely large trees. On top of this Merkle tree, Trillian provides two modes:
- An append-only Log mode, analogous to the original Certificate Transparency logs. In this mode, the Merkle tree is effectively filled up from the left, giving a dense Merkle tree.
- A Map mode that allows transparent storage of arbitrary key:value pairs. In this mode, the key's hash is used to designate a particular leaf of a deep Merkle tree, giving a sparse Merkle tree. (A Trillian Map is an unordered map; it does not allow enumeration of the Map's keys.)
Note that Trillian requires particular applications to provide their own personalities on top of the core transparent data store functionality; example code for a certificate transparency log and for a log-derived map are included to help with this.
Working with the Code
WARNING: The Trillian codebase is still under development, and is not yet suitable for production use. Everything here is subject to change without notice – including APIs, database schemas, and code layout.
Other dependency requirements are then handled by the Go tools (i.e. with
get -d -v -t ./...).
If you're not with the Go program of working within its own directory tree, then:
% cd <your favourite directory for git repos> % git clone https://github.com/google/trillian.git % ln -s `pwd`/trillian $GOPATH/src/github.com/google # you may have to make this directory first % cd trillian % go get -d -v -t ./... % go build ./...
If you are with the Go program, then you know what to do.
Rebuilding Generated Code
Some of the Trillian Go code is autogenerated from other files:
- gRPC message structures are originally provided as protocol buffer message definitions.
- Some unit tests use mock implementations of interfaces; these are created from the real implementations by GoMock.
Re-generating mock or protobuffer files is only needed if you're changing the original files; if you do, run the following command:
% go generate -x ./... # hunts for //go:generate comments and runs them
You'll need to have the following tools installed to do this:
mockgentool from https://github.com/golang/mock
protocand the Go protoc extension (see documentation linked from the protobuf site).
To run Trillian, including for any of the tests, you need to have an instance of MySQL running and configured
- to listen on the standard MySQL port 3306 (so
mysql --host=127.0.0.1 --port=3306connects OK)
- not to require a password for the
- not to include the
ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BYSQL mode (this is enabled by default for MySQL versions >= 5.7 but can be disabled, e.g. with
SET GLOBAL sql_mode=(SELECT REPLACE(@@sql_mode,'ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY',''));).
You can then set up the expected tables in a
test database like so:
% ./scripts/resetdb.sh Completely wipe and reset database 'test'. Are you sure? y
Assuming MySQL is running locally, the following command runs all of the unit tests for the code, and should complete successfully:
% go test -v ./...
Trillian also includes an integration test to confirm basic end-to-end functionality, which can be run with:
This test starts a Trillian server in Map mode, sets various key:value pairs and checks they can be retrieved.
Trillian is primarily implemented as a gRPC service; this service receives get/set requests over gRPC and retrieves the corresponding Merkle tree data from a separate storage layer (currently using MySQL), ensuring that the cryptographic properties of the tree are preserved along the way.
The Trillian service is multi-tenanted – a single Trillian installation
can support multiple Merkle trees in parallel, distinguished by their
– and operates in one of two modes:
- Log mode: an append-only collection of items.
- Map mode: a collection of key:value pairs.
In either case, Trillian's key transparency property is that cryptographic proofs of inclusion/consistency are available for data items added to the service.
The Trillian service expects to be paired with additional code that is specific to the particular application of the transparent store; this is known as a personality.
The primary purpose of a personality is to implement admission critera for the store, so that only particular types of data are added to the store. For example, a certificate transparency log only accepts data items that are valid certificates; a "CT Log" personality would police this, so that the Trillian service can process all incoming data blindly.
A personality may also perform canonicalization on incoming data, to convert equivalent formulations of the same underlying data to a single canonical format, avoiding needless duplication. (For example, keys in JSON dictionaries could be sorted, or Unicode string data could be normalized.)
The per-application personality is also responsible for providing an externally-visible interface, typically over HTTP[S].
Note that a personality may need to implement its own data store, seperate from Trillian. In particular, if the personality does not completely trust Trillian, it needs to store the various things that Trillian signs in order to be able to detect problems (and so the personality effectively also acts as a monitor for Trillian).
Trillian in Map mode can be thought of as providing a key:value store, together with cryptographic transparency guarantees for that data.
When running in Map mode, Trillian provides a straightforward gRPC API with the following available operations:
GetSignedMapRootreturns information about the current root of the Merkle tree representing the Map, including a revision (see below), hash value, timestamp and signature.
GetLeavesreturns leaf information for a specified set of key values, optionally as of a particular revision. The returned leaf information also includes inclusion proof data.
SetLeavesrequests inclusion of specified key:value pairs into the Map; these will appear as the next revision of the Map.
(Documentation may be out-of-date; please check the protocol buffer message definitions for the definitive current API.)
SetLeaves request includes a batch of updates to the Map; once all of
these updates have been applied, the Map has a new revision, with a new tree
head for that revision. To allow historical queries, the API allows queries
of the Map as of a particular revision.
TODO: add description of per-personality Mappers
TODO: add description of distribution: how many instances run, how distributed, how synchronized (master election), mention use of transactions as a fallback (in case of errors in master election).
When running in Log mode, Trillian provides a gRPC API whose operations are similar to those available for Certificate Transparency logs (cf. RFC 6962). These include:
GetLastestSignedLogRootreturns information about the current root of the Merkle tree for the log, including the tree size, hash value, timestamp and signature.
GetLeavesByIndexreturn leaf information for particular leaves, specified either by their hash value or index in the log.
QueueLeavesrequests inclusion of specified items into the log.
GetConsistencyProofreturn inclusion and consistency proof data.
In Log mode, Trillian includes an additional Signer component; this component periodically processes pending queued items and adds them to the Merkle tree, creating a new signed tree head as a result.
TODO: add description of distribution: how many instances run, how distributed etc.
As it currently stands, it is not possible to reliably monitor or audit a Trillian Map instance; key:value pairs can be modified and subsequently reset without anyone noticing.
A future plan to deal with this is to create a Logged Map, which combines a Trillian Map with a Trillian Log so that all published revisions of the Map have their signed tree head data appended to the corresponding Map.
Certificate Transparency Log
The most obvious application for Trillian in Log mode is to provide a certificate transparency (RFC 6962) Log. To do this, the CT Log personality needs to include all of the certificate-specific processing – in particular, checking that an item that has been suggested for inclusion is indeed a valid certificate that chains to an accepted root.
Verifiable Log-Derived Map
One useful application for Trillian in Map mode is to provide a verifiable log-derived map (VLDM), as described in the Verifiable Data Structures white paper (which uses the term 'log-backed map'). To do this, a VLDM personality would monitor the additions of entries to a Log, potentially external, and would write some kind of corresponding key:value data to a Trillian Map.
Clients of the VLDM are then able to verify that the entries in the Map they are shown are also seen by anyone auditing the Log for correct operation, which in turn allows the client to trust the key/value pairs returned by the Map.
A concrete example of this might be a VLDM that monitors a certificate transparency Log and builds a corresponding Map from domain names to the set of certificates associated with that domain.
The following table summarizes properties of data structures laid in the Verifiable Data Structures white paper. “Efficiently” means that a client can and should perform this validation themselves. “Full audit” means that to validate correctly, a client would need to download the entire dataset, and is something that in practice we expect a small number of dedicated auditors to perform, rather than being done by each client.
|Verifiable Log||Verifiable Map||Verifiable Log-Derived Map|
|Prove inclusion of value||Yes, efficiently||Yes, efficiently||Yes, efficiently|
|Prove non-inclusion of value||Impractical||Yes, efficiently||Yes, efficiently|
|Retrieve provable value for key||Impractical||Yes, efficiently||Yes, efficiently|
|Retrieve provable current value for key||Impractical||No||Yes, efficiently|
|Prove append-only||Yes, efficiently||No||Yes, efficiently .|
|Enumerate all entries||Yes, by full audit||Yes, by full audit||Yes, by full audit|
|Prove correct operation||Yes, efficiently||No||Yes, by full audit|
|Enable detection of split-view||Yes, efficiently||Yes, efficiently||Yes, efficiently|
-  -- although full audit is required to verify complete correct operation