The network and transport layer for humans, AI agents, and tools — one address space, one interface.

Olane is the transport layer that lets humans, AI agents, and tools talk to each other through a single unified interface. Every participant — a person, a Claude instance, a database, a browser tab, a Raspberry Pi — becomes an addressable node (o://...) reached the same way:

await node.use(address, { method, params });

That uniformity is the unlock. The caller does not need to know whether the responder is a human approving a request, an AI agent running inference, or a deterministic tool returning data. Same protocol. Same call pattern. Same address space.

What this enables:

• 🧑‍🤝‍🤖 Humans and agents on equal footing — both are nodes, both can call and be called
• 🛠️ Tools that don't care who's calling — a finance node serves a human, an AI agent, or another tool identically
• 🔄 Workflows that emerge instead of being pre-wired — uniform routing means agents discover paths through execution
• 🌐 Runs anywhere — over libp2p (WebSocket, TCP, WebRTC, QUIC), so nodes live in browsers, servers, mobile, IoT
• 🧠 One client, one mental model — no separate SDKs per participant type

• The Unified Interface — one call pattern for humans, AI, and tools
• First-Class Peers — how humans, AI, and tools join the same network
• The Transport — libp2p across browser, server, mobile, IoT
• What Emerges — Lanes, discovery, adaptive coordination
• Get Started — a working OS in four steps
• What Is Olane OS? — architecture and core concepts
• Framework Comparison — vs LangGraph, n8n, CrewAI
• Community — get help and contribute

Most agent frameworks invent a separate protocol per surface: an SDK for AI agents, a webhook system for humans, a tool registry for capabilities, a message bus for inter-agent communication. Olane collapses all four into one.

The same call shape works everywhere:

// Calling a deterministic tool
await node.use('o://finance/analyst', {
  method: 'analyze',
  params: { quarter: 'Q4' },
});

// Asking a human (same call shape)
await node.use('o://human/brendon', {
  method: 'approve',
  params: { request: 'release v0.9' },
});

// Delegating to an AI agent (same call shape)
await node.use('o://ai/claude', {
  method: 'summarize',
  params: { document: '...' },
});

// Reaching a tool inside someone's browser (same call shape)
await node.use('o://browser/analytics', {
  method: 'track',
  params: { event: 'pageview' },
});

One call pattern. One address scheme. One discovery mechanism. The execution model on the other end — human judgment, AI inference, deterministic code — is opaque to the caller, and that's the point.

Why this matters:

Every participant — human, AI, or tool — joins the same network the same way. Each gets an o:// address and is reached through node.use(). There is no asymmetry.

import { oHumanLoginTool } from '@olane/o-login';

const human = new oHumanLoginTool({
  respond: async (intent: string) => {
    // Approvals, decisions, judgment calls
    return 'Approved with conditions';
  },
  answer: async (question: string) => {
    return 'Answer from human';
  },
  receiveStream: async (data: any) => {
    // Process streamed data
  }
});

await human.start();
// Now reachable at o://human — any node
// (AI or otherwise) can call this person.

import { oAILoginTool } from '@olane/o-login';

const ai = new oAILoginTool({
  respond: async (intent: string) => {
    // Autonomous processing
    return await runModel(intent);
  },
  answer: async (question: string) => {
    return await runModel(question);
  },
  receiveStream: async (data: any) => {
    await processStream(data);
  }
});

await ai.start();
// Now reachable at o://ai — any node
// (human or otherwise) can call this agent.

Same network. Same interface. Different execution models. Humans bring judgment and oversight. AI agents bring automation and scale. Tools bring deterministic capability. The transport doesn't care which is which — and neither do callers.

Agent login → | Agent-agnostic design →

Olane nodes use libp2p for transport. Nodes live in browsers, mobile apps, IoT devices, edge servers, or the cloud — and any addressable peer (human, AI, or tool) can reach any other through the same o:// namespace.

import { oWebsocketNode } from '@olane/o-node';

const browserTool = new oWebsocketNode({
  address: new oAddress('o://browser/analytics'),
  leader: leaderAddress
});

await browserTool.start();
// Reachable from anywhere on the network

import { oClientNode } from '@olane/o-node';

const deviceTool = new oClientNode({
  address: new oAddress('o://device/sensors'),
  leader: leaderAddress
});

await deviceTool.start();
// Reachable from anywhere on the network

What the transport gives you:

Supported transports:

• 🌐 WebSocket — browser-compatible
• 🔌 TCP — server-to-server
• 📡 WebRTC — direct browser-to-browser
• ⚡ QUIC — low-latency UDP
• 📱 Bluetooth — coming soon for local devices

P2P networking → | Browser nodes guide →

When the interface is uniform and addresses are dynamic, you don't pre-build workflows — they emerge. We call these Lanes.

• 🔍 Discovery is uniform — agents find capabilities via DHT, not registries you maintain
• 🎯 Routing is dynamic — the system picks the best responder (human, AI, or tool) at execution time, not at compile time
• 📊 Patterns are recorded — successful execution paths become reusable Lanes, not pre-compiled DAGs
• 🔄 Substitution is free — a human falling offline routes to an AI peer with similar capabilities, and vice versa, because the call shape is the same

Real-world example: a compliance report needing both AI analysis and human approval.

// You don't define the workflow. You express the intent.
const result = await complianceNode.use({
  method: 'intent',
  params: {
    intent: 'Generate Q4 compliance report with appropriate oversight'
  }
});

What happens at runtime:

Cycle 1:  AI Agent A   → Fetches data, discovers 127 transactions
Cycle 2:  AI Agent A   → Analyzes, flags 3 anomalies
Cycle 3:  AI Agent A   → Decides human review is needed
Cycle 4:  System       → Discovers available human peers
Cycle 5:  Human        → Reviews flagged items (system pauses 2 hrs)
Cycle 6:  Human        → Approves 2, requests deeper analysis on 1
Cycle 7:  AI Agent B   → Picks up deep analysis (Agent A is busy)
Cycle 8:  AI Agent B   → Completes, no further issues
Cycle 9:  AI Agent B   → Routes back to human for final approval
Cycle 10: Human        → Approves final report
Cycle 11: AI Agent A   → Formats and delivers

This coordination wasn't programmed. It emerged from peers pursuing a shared intent across a uniform interface — humans and AI substituted for each other, work paused for human latency without breaking, and the path is now recorded as a reusable Lane.

Emergent workflows →

A working OS instance in four steps. Same interface for tools, humans, and AI from the very first call.

1. Install

pnpm add @olane/os @olane/o-core @olane/o-login

2. Start an OS instance

An Olane OS instance needs a leader (the discovery / routing entry point) and at least one node. Both are addressable — o://leader and o://node.

import { OlaneOS } from '@olane/os';
import { NodeType, oAddress } from '@olane/o-core';

const os = new OlaneOS({
  nodes: [
    {
      type: NodeType.LEADER,
      address: new oAddress('o://leader'),
      leader: null,
      parent: null,
    },
    {
      type: NodeType.NODE,
      address: new oAddress('o://node'),
      leader: null,
      parent: null,
    },
  ],
});

await os.start();

3. Call any address — same shape for everything

Every node on the network exposes .use(). Grab any node and start calling.

const node = os.entryNode();

const response = await node.use(new oAddress('o://node'), {
  method: 'some_tool',
  params: { /* ... */ },
});

if (response.result.success) {
  console.log(response.result.data);
} else {
  console.error(response.result.error);
}

4. Bring a human or an AI into the same network

Each login tool joins as a child of the OS's root leader, so the rest of the network can reach it. Once attached, the same node.use(...) call reaches a person or a model — no new SDK, no new protocol.

import { oHumanLoginTool, oAILoginTool } from '@olane/o-login';

const leader = os.rootLeader!;

// A human joins at o://human
const human = new oHumanLoginTool({
  leader: leader.address,
  parent: leader.address,
  respond: async (intent) => `Approved: ${intent}`,
  answer: async (q) => 'Human answer',
  receiveStream: async (data) => { /* ... */ },
});
leader.addChildNode(human);

// An AI agent joins at o://ai
const ai = new oAILoginTool({
  leader: leader.address,
  parent: leader.address,
  respond: async (intent) => await runModel(intent),
  answer: async (q) => await runModel(q),
  receiveStream: async (data) => { /* ... */ },
});
leader.addChildNode(ai);

// Reach either through the same call shape
await node.use(new oAddress('o://human'), {
  method: 'respond',
  params: { intent: 'Approve release v0.9' },
});

await node.use(new oAddress('o://ai'), {
  method: 'respond',
  params: { intent: 'Summarize the Q4 report' },
});

That's the unified interface in practice. Tools, humans, and AI are all reached through node.use(address, ...) — the caller doesn't change shape based on who's on the other end.

📚 Full setup guide →

Olane OS is the operating system built on top of the Olane transport layer. Where the transport gives you uniform addressing and routing, the OS gives you the runtime, the discovery, and the conventions for building real systems on top of it.

Participants (humans / AI / tools)
        ↓
Unified Interface (o:// + node.use)
        ↓
Transport (libp2p — WebSocket, TCP, WebRTC, QUIC)

Core concepts:

• 🌐 o:// protocol — hierarchical addresses, like URLs, for any participant
• 🛠️ Tool nodes — capabilities you build (o://finance, o://crm)
• 🤖 Agents — humans or AI, both first-class addressable peers
• 🔄 Lanes — emergent, recorded workflows that arise from execution

Three-layer model →

📚 Browse all documentation →

Why Olane → | Three-layer model →

• 📚 Documentation: olane.com/docs
• 💬 GitHub Discussions: github.com/olane-labs/olane/discussions
• 🐛 GitHub Issues: github.com/olane-labs/olane/issues
• 💬 Discord: discord.gg/olane
• 📧 Email: support@olane.io

We welcome contributions. See the Contributing Guide for details.

Areas:

• Tool nodes and integrations
• Documentation and tutorials
• Core package improvements
• Real-world examples
• Bug fixes and performance

Dual-licensed under your choice of:

• MIT License — simple, permissive
• Apache License 2.0 — permissive with patent protection

Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion shall be dual-licensed as above, without additional terms.

Ready to build?

• 🚀 Get Started
• 📚 Full Documentation
• 💬 Join Discord

Copyright © 2025 Olane Inc.